Upstream structural barriers undermine the potential of HIV programmes to deliver on ambitious targets to prevent new infections and save lives. Interventions addressing these upstream factors are considered beyond the remit of the HIV response and too expensive for the HIV budget. This reflects conventional priority-setting and financing frameworks that consider only HIV outcomes and budgets.
With shrinking international HIV funding on one hand, and the wide range of priorities established by the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) on the other hand, development interventions with multiple outcomes provide an opportunity for greater value for money. Yet, opportunities to realise synergies with non-HIV investments tend to be missed due to:
Cross-sectoral co-financing is an innovative solution that can increase efficiency in the allocation of government, donor and other budget-holders’ resources.
Co-financing is a financing approach whereby two or more sectors or budget holders, each with different development objectives, co-fund an intervention or broader investment area which advances their respective objectives simultaneously.
Co-financing could provide a new way of financing high-impact interventions that can achieve benefits across the interconnected SDGs and targets.
The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) – a STRIVE affiliate institution who was closely involved in the development of the co-financing approach – has developed a work stream on the operationalisation of cross-sectoral co-financing in seven countries in sub-Saharan Africa, as an innovative financing mechanism to strengthen universal health coverage and human development.
This has involved the development of training materials for policy-makers, as well as the training of multi-sectoral government teams from South Africa, Tanzania, Malawi and Ethiopia. Further support is being provided to these countries, as well as Kenya, Zambia and Ghana, in translating co-financing models into high impact, cost-effective innovations in programming and financing structures.
These implementation trials were implemented over a two-year period from 2017 to 2019. The outcomes provide further information on the barriers and enablers of engaging in co-financing models, along with additional evidence of the gains possible from a co-financing approach in practice.